TLDR
Bloomerang has better analytics and email; Network for Good bundles coaching but costs more for what you get. Neither handles grants — plan on a separate tool if you run federal or foundation funding.
| Feature | Bloomerang | Network for Good | GrantPipe |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost (mid-size org) | $125-$249/mo | $499-$799/mo | $99–$499/mo |
| Grant lifecycle | No | No | Yes — post-award to compliance |
The Core Difference in Positioning
Bloomerang is a donor CRM. Network for Good is a fundraising platform. That distinction shapes everything about how each product is designed and priced.
Bloomerang optimizes for donor relationship quality: retention rates, engagement scores, giving history, and communication tracking. It is the tool of choice for development staff who want to manage individual donor relationships with precision.
Network for Good optimizes for fundraising throughput: donation pages, event registration, peer-to-peer campaigns, and strategic coaching. It is designed for organizations that want a single vendor to handle the entire fundraising operation.
Pricing Structure
The pricing gap is substantial. At $125-$249/mo for Bloomerang versus $499-$799/mo for Network for Good, the difference is $4,000-$7,000/yr. Network for Good bundles coaching services into that price, which changes the calculation if your organization needs development strategy support. If you have experienced development staff who manage their own strategy, you are paying for services you do not use.
What Neither Platform Covers
Executive directors managing both individual donors and grant funding will find the same gap in both platforms: no grant management, no restricted fund compliance, no funder reporting workflows.
This is worth naming explicitly because the comparison can seem comprehensive—two polished nonprofit platforms with clear trade-offs—while missing a significant operational category. An organization that manages $500,000 in annual grant funding needs a compliance layer that neither Bloomerang nor Network for Good provides.
Making the Decision
The choice between Bloomerang and Network for Good typically comes down to two factors:
-
Budget: If $500/mo is sustainable and you want an all-in-one fundraising platform, Network for Good’s bundle has value. If you are working within a tighter software budget, Bloomerang covers the core donor CRM use case more affordably.
-
Team capacity: Network for Good’s coaching model suits organizations with limited internal development expertise. Bloomerang suits organizations with capable development staff who want tools, not guidance.
For executive directors whose funding mix includes grants alongside individual donors, the more important evaluation is whether either platform adequately covers the full operational picture—including compliance.
The GrantPipe Alternative
Neither Bloomerang nor Network for Good was built for organizations that manage restricted grants alongside donor relationships. We built GrantPipe to handle both in one system at $20-$99/mo—no coaching bundle markup, no per-contact scaling. If your funding mix includes government or foundation grants with compliance requirements, the Bloomerang-vs-Network for Good comparison leaves out the capability that matters most.
| Feature | Bloomerang | Network for Good | GrantPipe |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $125/mo | $499/mo | $20/mo |
| Donor CRM | Full (retention-focused) | Full (bundled) | Full |
| Fundraising pages | Limited | Yes (built-in) | No |
| Peer-to-peer fundraising | No | Yes | No |
| Coaching included | No | Yes | No |
| Grant compliance | No | No | Yes |
| Restricted fund tracking | No | No | Yes |
| Setup fees | No | No | No |
PROS & CONS
Bloomerang
Pros
- Transparent, published pricing with no demo required to get a number for a budget proposal
- Donor retention analytics—lapse risk, engagement scoring, giving dashboards—are among the best in this price range
- No bundled coaching requirement means you pay only for the CRM, not services you may not use
Cons
- No grant management or compliance features at any tier
- Price scales with record count, so contact database growth increases the annual cost
PROS & CONS
Network for Good
Pros
- Bundled fundraising coaching included—useful for organizations without experienced internal development staff
- Digital fundraising tools including peer-to-peer pages, donation forms, and event registration are built in rather than add-ons
Cons
- No published pricing; a demo is required before any cost number is available
- No grant lifecycle management at any tier—restricted fund tracking and compliance reporting require a separate tool
- Transaction fees on processed donations may apply on top of the subscription cost and must be explicitly confirmed during the sales process
Q&A
What should an ED do if they need both donor CRM and grant compliance?
Bloomerang covers donor CRM well but has no grant features. Network for Good bundles fundraising tools and coaching but also lacks grant management. Organizations that need both donor management and grant compliance typically end up running two separate systems. GrantPipe combines both in one platform at $20-$99/mo with no setup fees, which avoids the cost and data fragmentation of maintaining separate tools.
Verdict
Network for Good is priced for organizations that want an all-in-one fundraising platform with coaching included and have the budget to support it. Bloomerang is the better choice for organizations that want a focused, high-quality donor CRM at a lower price and are comfortable sourcing their own fundraising strategy. Neither covers grant management—that gap applies to both. GrantPipe addresses that gap directly: donor management plus grant compliance at $20-$99/mo, without the $499/mo price tag or the missing compliance layer.
Frequently asked